CONCLUSION

Charles Darwin

Darwinism is a dogmatic belief, a superstitious faith. This is the reason why evidence opposed to the theory of evolution is constantly being brought up through countless proofs, Atlas of Creation series, fossil exhibitions and detailed descriptions of individual fossils are provided to show that life forms never changed: to be a means whereby some people who have lost the ability to think objectively under the spell of a superstitious religion can see the truth.
For the last 150 years or so, the theory of evolution has been kept alive through speculation and propaganda. People are constantly subjected to subconscious indoctrination. Although evolution is based on no scientific evidence at all, it is still taught in schools, exhibited in museums with imaginative reconstructions and is the subject of frequent reports in the press. The true source of this effective indoctrination is not science, but rather a false belief system. The religion of Darwinism has convinced people of an untruth and has depicted a lie as true science.
But a falsehood without supporters cannot survive long. The theory of evolution is losing its adherents, one by one. People who learn the true nature of Darwinism can clearly see the illogicality of defending it and therefore, reject the theory. Evolutionary scientists who see the emergence of countless unchanged living fossils realize that they have dedicated their lives to a lie, and suffer due regret.
All who remain are a few admirers of Darwin, and all they can do is to recite the same old scenarios. Willingly or not, they too have recognized the defeat of Darwinism. They are unable to find anyone to address their conferences and suffer the shame of that fact whenever Darwinism is defended.
That shame can only grow, because fossils constantly produce enough evidence to demolish Darwinism, showing that living things never evolved, and were created exactly as they are today. The truth revealed by fossils cannot be concealed or ignored. The religion that is Darwinism has come to an end.

EXAMPLES OF THE EVOLUTIONIST PROPAGANDA THAT HAS DECEIVED THE WORLD FOR 160 YEARS peculation, slogans incompatible with the truth, and imaginary reconstructions are Darwinism’s main propaganda tools. By these means, the public is constantly indoctrinated with the idea that the theory of evolution is a scientific. In fact, however, evolution cannot explain how even the first living cell came into being. Evolutionists have no answer as to why there is not a single intermediate form fossil to support the theory—or why, if evolution really took place, living things remained unchanged for tens of millions of years, or how and when unconscious atoms originally decided to see, hear, touch feel and think. The claims of the theory of evolution are illogical; even a primary-school student would find them ridiculous. Increasingly large numbers of people are aware that this irrational propaganda, produced with media backing, is totally worthless. Science People and Eureka Moment Darwin and Molecular Revolution What Make Us Different

THE RENOWNED PHILOSOPHER ANTHONY FLEW         DECLARED THAT SCIENCE POINTS TO CREATION As people have certainly been influenced by me, I want to try and correct the enormous damage I may have done. —Anthony Flew Anthony Flew, one of the best-known atheist philosophers of his day, admitted that the atheism he had espoused for the previous 66 years was a philosophy that had collapsed in the face of the complex structure in DNA. The 81-year-old British professor became an atheist at the age of 15 and first made his name in the academic field with an article published in 1950. Over the next 54 years, he espoused atheism at the universities of Oxford, Aberdeen, Keele and Reading, where he taught, at a large number of U.S. and Canadian universities he visited, and in debates, books, lectures and articles. Not long ago, however, Flew renounced his error and admitted that the universe was created. In a report carried by The Sunday Times, he said: “I have been persuaded that it is simply out of the question that the first living matter evolved out of dead matter and then developed into an extraordinarily complicated creature.” (Stuart Wavell, Will Iredale, “Sorry, says atheistinchief, I do believe in God after all,” The Sunday Times, 12 December 2004; http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-1400368,00.html) A single consciousness, a universal wisdom, pervades the universe. The discoveries of science, those that search the quantum nature of subatomic matter, have moved us to the brink of a startling realization: all existence is the expression of this wisdom. In the laboratories we experience it as information that first physically articulated as energy and then condensed into the form of matter. Every particle, every being, from atom to human, appears to represent a level of information, of wisdom. (Gerald Schroeder, The Hidden Face of God, New York: Touchstone, 2001, p. XI.)  04-11-2007 09-12-2004 12-12-2004 Anthony Flew’s abandonment of atheism elicited a wide reaction in the domestic and international press. News organizations such as the Times, The New York Times and MSNBC described the development as “Leading Atheist Admits: I now Believe in God,” “An Aatheist’s U-turn” and “Leading Atheist Concludes: God does Exist.”

THE DIRECTOR OF THE HUMAN GENOME PROJECT DESCRIBES HIS FAITH IN ALLAH (GOD)

The well-known scientist Francis Collins, head of the Human Genome Project, had been an atheist since the age of 27. Francis Collins But in later years, Collins would see the “stupendous information” contained in DNA and turned into a believer, describing why he believed in his book The Language of God. The book states that there is a logical basis for the existence of a Creator and that scientific discoveries “draw man closer to God.” An article in the 11 June, 2006, edition of the Sunday Times, headed “I’ve Found God, Says Man Who Cracked the Genome,” read: One of the great tragedies of our time is this impression that has been created that science and religion have to be at war. I don’t see that as necessary at all and I think it is deeply disappointing that the shrill voices that occupy the extremes of this spectrum have dominated the stage for the past 20 years. When you make a breakthrough it is a moment of scientific exhilaration because you have been on this search and seem to have found it. But it is also a moment where I at least feel closeness to the Creator in the sense of having now perceived something that no human knew before but God knew all along. When you have for the first time in front of          you this 3.1 billion-letter instruction book that conveys all kinds of information and all kinds of mystery about humankind, you can’t survey that going through page after page without a sense of awe. I can’t help but look at those pages and have a vague sense that this is giving me a glimpse of God’s mind.